St Catherine's College Oxford

Search

Giving Uptake to the Metaphorical Meanings of Delusions: A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Psychiatrist

Home >> VBP Meetings Webinars ASS >> Giving Uptake to the Metaphorical Meanings of Delusions: A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Psychiatrist

Giving Uptake to the Metaphorical Meanings of Delusions: A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Psychiatrist

29 May 2026 – 3pm
Zoom

Meeting Details


Rosa Ritunano & Kathleen Murphy-Hollies, University of Birmingham

Kathleen Murphy-Hollies (Philosophy, University of Birmingham) and Rosa Ritunnano (Institute of Mental Health, University of Birmingham), Giving Uptake to the Metaphorical Meanings of Delusions: A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Psychiatrist.

Abstract: In this talk, we begin with the philosophical argument for attending to the metaphorical meanings of delusions in order to secure interpersonal connection, best understanding, and epistemic justice for those with delusional beliefs. Then, we turn to the practical matter of how psychiatrists can integrate such insights into their work with patients and what this shift reveals about the embodied nature of delusional experiences in psychosis

If you would like to register for the seminar, or for the whole series, please contact the Network Lead, Lubomira Radoilska at L.V.Radoilska@kent.ac.uk

The Series

We meet online on the last Friday of the month at 15:00 UK time.

The seminars explore how norms of action and norms of belief shape institutional and interpersonal interactions — at times aligning, at times diverging, and at times generating tensions. Norms of action govern role responsibilities, forms of participation, and institutional procedures through which collaboration is organised. Norms of belief govern what counts as credible knowledge, whose expertise is recognised, and which evidential standards guide decision-making. In many institutional contexts these two sets of norms diverge: for instance, participatory structures might invite contribution while epistemic authority remains narrowly defined.

Our discussions bring these and related issues out of the background so they can be confronted and clarified. By fostering dialogue between perspectives – bridging scholarship, lived experience, policy work and professional practice – we aim to develop conceptual resources and strategies to constructively address these challenges.

Search the VBP Website